Chapter One
General Instructions
The current curricular procedures of California
State University, Hayward were developed and approved by the faculty through
the Academic Senate structure in Fall Quarter, 1993. The President endorsed the
Senate's action on December 21, 1993.
Academic policies governing curricular proposals
derive from the CSUH Academic Senate, Chancellor's Executive Orders, and Title
5 of the California Code of Regulations. Appropriate documents and sections
will be cited throughout this manual.
Formats (with the exception of those for new
majors) have been locally developed, reviewed, and approved. Their purpose is
to provide necessary information for reviewers at the department, college, and
University level, as well as for administrators and staff who must implement
them in the Catalog, Class Schedule, and various campus databases. New majors
require approval by the CSU Chancellor's Office and review by the California
Postsecondary Education Commission. Their format has been prescribed by the
Chancellor's Office. Teaching Credential programs require approval by the
California Commission on Teacher Credentialing in a separate format from that
used for campus approvals.
(see flow chart)
- Proposals to initiate,
modify, or discontinue courses and programs (programs are: majors,
options, minors, certificate programs, subject matter preparation programs,
and credential programs) typically originate in an
instructional department or program committee. (The significant
exception is the General Education-Breadth program which originates with
the campus-wide committee charged with oversight of the G.E. program.) The
department or program committee prepares the proposal according to the
appropriate format given in this manual and submits it to the college
office for review and approval. (Hereafter "department"
signifies "department and/or program committee")
- The college office
reviews the proposal and submits it to the faculty review body of
that college.
- If the proposal affects another
college, the dean must submit a copy to the dean of that college and
the appropriate department(s) for analysis and recommendation.
All program modifications must be forwarded to the other deans for their
review.
- If a proposal for a new
course, modified course, discontinued
course, or program modification is approved by
affected departments, college deans, and faculty review bodies, the dean
of the originating college submits a copy to the appropriate Associate
Vice Presidents, Academic Programs/Graduate Studies and Academic Resources/Administration,
for review. After their comments are received, the originating department
makes any necessary adjustments and the college dean gives final
approval. Course additions, deletions, and modifications are entered in
the Course Inventory (the master list of university courses) by the college
office. An information copy of the final, approved version is forwarded
to the Associate Vice President, Academic Programs/Graduate
Studies, for placement in the Catalog and/or class schedule. GS
course proposals go to CIC because there is no college curriculum
committee. CIC approval is final.
- If a proposal for a new
course, modified course, discontinued course, or program modification is
not approved beyond the department (i.e. by the college dean, college
faculty review body, other affected departments or colleges), it may be
submitted to the Committee on Instruction and Curriculum (CIC)
after review by the associate vice presidents.
- Proposals involving new
programs; discontinued programs; the assignment
or modification in assignment of a course to the General
Education-Breadth and U.S. History, Constitution, and
American Ideals requirements; or any of the preceding items which
do not receive the necessary approvals must be submitted to the associate
vice presidents for review before beginning the Academic Senate
process. After their comments are received, the originating department
makes any final adjustments and submits 20 copies of the proposal to the college
office. The college office adds its endorsement and forwards 15
copies to the Academic Senate Office for placement on the agenda
of the CIC. (Courses proposed for the Critical Thinking, Capstone, and
Cultural Groups/Women G.E. requirements must first go to a CIC to the
appropriate CIC subcommittee. Courses proposed for Humanities or Social
Sciences which are outside ALSS must first go to the ALSS curriculum
committee and courses proposed for Science which are outside that college
must first go to the Science curriculum committee. See Chapter 6 for
specifics.)
- The Committee on
Instruction and Curriculum reviews and acts upon the proposals it
receives.(The Committee on Academic Planning and Resources must
also approve all program discontinuances.) If the request is approved, the
proposal will be duplicated (95 copies) by the originating department and
submitted to the Academic Senate Office for placement on the
agenda of the following meeting of the Executive Committee of the
Academic Senate.
- The Executive Committee
places CIC items on the Academic Senate agenda if they are deemed complete
and appropriate.
- The Academic Senate
acts on the curricular proposals it receives.
- Proposals endorsed by the
Senate are forwarded to the President for final approval. For all
proposals except new majors, credential programs, subject matter preparation
programs, and certain options (see Appendix A), the President's approval
is final. An information copy is forwarded to the Associate Vice President,
Academic Programs/Graduate Studies, for placement in the Catalog. The
college office adds, deletes, or modifies courses in the Course Inventory
(CI) after notification of Presidential approval.
- All new majors
require review and approval by the Chancellor's Office and review
by the California Postsecondary Education Commission before they
can be implemented. Certain options (see Appendix A) also require review
and approval by the Chancellor's Office. Proposals for program discontinuance
must be reviewed by the Chancellor's Office. Proposals to place a new program
on the Academic Plan of CSUH must be submitted to the Chancellor's
Office for approval by the CSU Board of Trustees. Proposals for
new credential programs and subject matter preparation programs must be
submitted to the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing
for approval. Submissions will be handled by the Associate Vice President,
Academic Programs/Graduate Studies. The college office is notified after
final approval so it can make any necessary Course Inventory adjustments.
- It is necessary to
secure approval of all curricular proposals except new courses by such
time that it is possible to include them in the next edition of the
University Catalog. (A new on-line edition of the Catalog is published yearly
in July; paper copies are printed only in even-numbered years.) For this
to occur, curricular proposals must have received college approval by July
1 of the preceding year. Those also requiring CIC approval must receive it
by the end of the Fall Quarter preceding publication of the new catalog.
To be included in the catalog, new programs must have received final
approval, Presidential or Chancellor's Office, by February 1.
- New course proposals
which are to be implemented between published catalogs must receive all
necessary approvals by the deadline established by the Scheduling
Office, before or early in the quarter preceding the quarter of desired
implementation. This amount of time is essential for preparation of
materials for the Class Schedule.
- All approved curricular
proposals must appear in either the Catalog or Class Schedule to be
officially implemented.
- Originators (departments
or program committees) are responsible for insuring that all information
required on the prescribed formats is accurate and complete, that evidence
of consultation with other affected departments or committees is provided,
that the proper number of copies is provided for each review level, that
the request is submitted to the college dean for action, that necessary
modifications identified by reviewers are made to the proposal, and that
established deadlines are met
- College deans
are responsible for insuring that they review and act upon all curricular
proposals received, consult with the faculty review body of their college,
consult with the deans and departments of other affected colleges, submit
copies to the associate vice presidents for review before approving documents,
notify the Associate Vice President, Academic Programs/Graduate Studies
about proposals approved at the college level, forward the proper number
of copies of documents requiring CIC and/or Academic Senate approval, and
meet established deadlines.
- Associate vice
presidents and other reviewing administrative officers are responsible
for: a) examining all curricular proposals for technical correctness and
evidence of appropriate consultation and b) for working with the Senate
staff in finalizing proposals requiring Academic Senate and Presidential
action.
- The Committee on
Instruction and Curriculum is responsible for reviewing curricular
proposals on the basis of their appropriateness for CSUH; their
relationship to existing courses and programs; student and community need;
conformity with campus mission, goals, and academic plan; and financial
feasibility (including potential impact on other units).
Program Reviews of existing curricula, the
placement of proposed new programs on the Academic Plan, and the discontinuance
of academic programs are governed by special procedures and policies described
in Chapter 7, 8 and 9. These proposals require review by the Committee on
Academic Planning and Resources (CAPR).

Cover| User's Guide| Contents| Next (Chapter 2)