History of the Program
Beginning Fall Quarter 1997 California State
University, Hayward, like many universities, instituted an
"assured access" requirement. This requirement called
for all students to have assured access to computers and the
network. Because Cal State Hayward draws heavily from an urban
population, and because a number of our students are first
generation college attendees, there was concern that this
requirement would place an additional financial burden on
our neediest students. This paper discusses the program designed
at Cal State Hayward to address these concerns and to protect
students who might otherwise be adversely affected by the
assured access requirement.
Faculty and administrators worked together
to design a safety net strategy which involved creating a
laptop loaner program for students meeting the dual criteria
of greatest financial need plus greatest academic need for
access to computers and the network. Greatest financial need
was defined as expected family contribution zero (EFC0), and
greatest academic need as enrollment in three or more courses
which require significant computer and network access outside
of class hours.
Faculty identified assured access courses
in the Schedule of Classes; Financial Aid identified EFC0
students; the Registrar identified those enrolled in three
or more assured access classes; and Computing Services combined
the data to create a list of students eligible for the laptop
program. Using previous year's financial aid and enrollment
data, we were able to forecast the number of students who
would be eligible, but not the number of students who would
opt to take advantage of this program. Nonetheless, from survey
data gathered from our students, as well as students at other
campuses, we believed 200 laptops would be adequate.
At the end of early registration for Fall
Quarter, a program was run which identified 143 students who
were taking four or more assured access classes and an additional
176 students who were taking three assured access classes.
To avoid running out of computers with students still in line,
we decided to initially use four classes as the break point
so we could determine the approximate percentage of takers.
Letters were sent to those students informing them they were
eligible and giving them instructions on how to receive their
computers. Fifty-two percent of these students chose to take
advantage of this program. We then invited the remaining students
to participate, resulting in 188 of our 200 laptops being
loaned out, i.e., a laptop for every eligible student choosing
to participate in this program.
To prevent students from abusing the program
by registering for assured access classes, signing out a computer
and then dropping the classes a final eligibility list was
run after add/drop. Students were informed in the original
letter that if they were found to be no longer eligible after
add/drop, we might request immediate return of their computers.
This did not turn out to be a problem, and it has not been
necessary to request early return of any computers.
Students were required to attend a 45 minute
orientation which covered configuration, legal responsibilities
and general purpose how to's for using the laptops. Each laptop
included personal productivity software, MS-Works; browsers,
both Netscape and Explorer; and a pre-configured modem for
accessing the student modem pool. At the end of the orientation
students were required to sign for the computer - acknowledging
their responsibilities for returning it or paying for replacement.
The computers were then checked out for the entire quarter
with a return date following Finals Week. During the quarter
if students had any problems with their machines they were
encouraged to bring them into the Student Technology Service
Center (STSC) for consultation. Throughout the quarter student
workshops were provided by the STSC for the laptop software.
Students who checked out computers received
a notice eight weeks into the quarter reminding them of the
return date; telling them when check-in would be available,
and asking them to call the STSC to set up an appointment
to return the computer. At check-in the STSC verified that
all pieces were returned in working order, and students were
asked to complete a survey regarding their experience with
the computer.
Follow-up calls were made to students who
failed to request appointments. The students were informed
that if they failed to return their computers by the deadline
their student account would be charged for the amount of the
computer and a hold placed on their records until the debt
was cleared. Late fees were charged for computers turned in
late. We also developed a fee schedule for un-returned components.
For Fall Quarter only 2 of the 188 machines were not returned;
both had been reported stolen. In one case the machine has
been paid for and in the other the student is appealing the
charge. To avoid creating a special administrative system
for the check-out, check-in, fees and records hold processing,
the library's circulation system was modified to handle laptops,
as well as books.
Survey results for Fall Quarter were extremely
positive. The majority of students used the computer for email,
browsing the Web and word processing.
This program has been a tremendous success
and has generated significant good will between students and
the University. An additional ten Student Assistants have
been added to the STSC to help students with questions and
an additional 80 hours of professional staff help handle the
heavy periods of check-outs and check-ins of the laptops.
|