Top NavTop NavTop Nav

What would have happened had the federal government never adopted Social Security?

Adrian Stoian

Adrian Stoian

  • July 7, 2010 5:14am

Explorations in Economic History published a paper co-authored by Assistant Economics Professor Adrian Stoian titled, “Welfare spending and mortality rates for the elderly before the Social, with Security era”. He examined the impact of the old-age assistance state programs on elderly mortality rates during the period from 1929 through 1938 before the first OASI (Social Security) payments were issued.

 “We analyze the impact of the original means-tested old-age assistance (OAA) programs on the health of the elderly prior to the first Social Security pension payments. Before 1935 a number of states had enacted their own OAA laws. After 1935 the federal government began offering matching grants and thus stimulated the adoption of OAA programs by the states. A new panel data set of 75 cities for each year between 1929 and 1938 combines mortality rates for older age groups with three measures of the OAA programs, spending on non-age-specific relief and a rich set of correlates. The data are analyzed using difference-in- difference-in-difference and instrumental variables methods. Our results suggest that old-age assistance in the 1930s had little impact on the death rate of the elderly. Our sense is that the OAA programs in the 1930s transferred the elderly from general relief programs without necessarily increasing the resources available to them.”


© California State University, East Bay. All Rights Reserved.